Key Specifications

SpecificationMixtral 8x7BMixtral 8x22B
Vendormistralmistral
Version8x7b8x22b
Release Date2023-12-112024-04-10
Context Window32000 tokens64000 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BMixtral 8x22BWinner
ARC91.6Mixtral 8x7B
BBH78.474.5Mixtral 8x7B
GPQA43Mixtral 8x7B
GSM8K79.778.6Mixtral 8x7B
HUMANEVAL7945.2Mixtral 8x7B
IFEVAL72.1Mixtral 8x7B
MATH3846Mixtral 8x22B
MMLU77.277.8Mixtral 8x22B
MUSR53.5Mixtral 8x7B
WINOGRANDE82Mixtral 8x7B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Mixtral 8x7BMixtral 8x22B
Input$0.7$1.2
Output$0.7$1.2
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Mixtral 8x7B 대 Mixtral 8x22B

모델 개요

Mixtral 8x7B and Mixtral 8x22B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

핵심 사양

공급업체출시일컨텍스트 창라이선스
Mistral / Mistral2023-12-11 / 2024-04-1032K / 64KApache 2.0 / Apache 2.0

벤치마크 성능

벤치마크Mixtral 8x7BMixtral 8x22B승자
ARC91.6A
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)78.474.5A
GPQA43.0A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)79.778.6A
HumanEval79.045.2A
IFEval72.1A
MATH38.046.0B
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)77.277.8B
MUSR53.5A
WinoGrande82.0A

가격 비교

입력출력캐시 읽기캐시 쓰기
— / —— / —— / —— / —

백만 토큰당 — A / B

강점 & 약점

Mixtral 8x7B

  • ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Mixtral 8x22B

  • ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
  • ⚠️ HumanEval 45.2,代码能力较弱。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

편집자 의견

Mixtral 8x7B and Mixtral 8x22B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

참고문헌

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.