Key Specifications

SpecificationLlama 3.1 8BQwen2.5 7B
Vendormetaalibaba
Version3.1-8b2.5-7b
Release Date2024-07-232024-09-19
Context Window128000 tokens131072 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseLlama 3 Community LicenseQwen License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8BQwen2.5 7BWinner
ARC87.488.4Qwen2.5 7B
BBH67.161.9Llama 3.1 8B
GPQA34.828.5Llama 3.1 8B
GSM8K58.863.7Qwen2.5 7B
HUMANEVAL63.466.5Qwen2.5 7B
IFEVAL62.155.4Llama 3.1 8B
MATH31.141.9Qwen2.5 7B
MMLU7373.6Qwen2.5 7B
MUSR41.746.9Qwen2.5 7B
WINOGRANDE77.671.4Llama 3.1 8B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Llama 3.1 8BQwen2.5 7B
Input$0.18$0.15
Output$0.18$0.15
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Llama 3.1 8B 대 Qwen2.5 7B

모델 개요

Llama 3.1 8B and Qwen2.5 7B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

핵심 사양

공급업체출시일컨텍스트 창라이선스
Meta / Alibaba2024-07-23 / 2024-09-19128K / 131KLlama 3 Community License / Qwen License

벤치마크 성능

벤치마크Llama 3.1 8BQwen2.5 7B승자
ARC87.488.4B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)67.161.9A
GPQA34.828.5A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)58.863.7B
HumanEval63.466.5B
IFEval62.155.4A
MATH31.141.9B
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)73.073.6B
MUSR41.746.9B
WinoGrande77.671.4A

가격 비교

입력출력캐시 읽기캐시 쓰기
— / —— / —— / —— / —

백만 토큰당 — A / B

강점 & 약점

Llama 3.1 8B

  • ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Qwen2.5 7B

  • ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

편집자 의견

Llama 3.1 8B and Qwen2.5 7B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

참고문헌

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.