Key Specifications

SpecificationClaude 3 OpusClaude 3 Sonnet
Vendoranthropicanthropic
Version3-opus3-sonnet
Release Date2024-03-042024-03-04
Context Window200000 tokens200000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusClaude 3 SonnetWinner
ARC94.594.8Claude 3 Sonnet
BBH81.676.1Claude 3 Opus
GPQA4635.9Claude 3 Opus
GSM8K91.884Claude 3 Opus
HUMANEVAL83.374.5Claude 3 Opus
IFEVAL79.274.3Claude 3 Opus
MATH42.742.4Claude 3 Opus
MMLU81.281.5Claude 3 Sonnet
MUSR53.364.1Claude 3 Sonnet
WINOGRANDE81.983.8Claude 3 Sonnet

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Claude 3 OpusClaude 3 Sonnet
Input$15$3
Output$75$15
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Claude 3 Opus 대 Claude 3 Sonnet

모델 개요

Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3 Sonnet are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

핵심 사양

공급업체출시일컨텍스트 창라이선스
Anthropic / Anthropic2024-03-04 / 2024-03-04200K / 200KProprietary / Proprietary

벤치마크 성능

벤치마크Claude 3 OpusClaude 3 Sonnet승자
ARC94.594.8Tie
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)81.676.1A
GPQA46.035.9A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)91.884.0A
HumanEval83.374.5A
IFEval79.274.3A
MATH42.742.4Tie
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)81.281.5Tie
MUSR53.364.1B
WinoGrande81.983.8B

가격 비교

입력출력캐시 읽기캐시 쓰기
— / —— / —— / —— / —

백만 토큰당 — A / B

강점 & 약점

Claude 3 Opus

  • ✅ MMLU score 81.2, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 83.3, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 200K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Claude 3 Sonnet

  • ✅ MMLU score 81.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 200K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

편집자 의견

Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3 Sonnet each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

참고문헌

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.