Key Specifications

SpecificationGrok-2DeepSeek V3
Vendorxaideepseek
Version2v3
Release Date2024-08-132024-12-26
Context Window131072 tokens64000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryDeepSeek License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGrok-2DeepSeek V3Winner
BBH8484.9DeepSeek V3
GSM8K93.289.3Grok-2
HUMANEVAL88.482.6Grok-2
MATH76.861.6Grok-2
MMLU87.588.5DeepSeek V3

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Grok-2DeepSeek V3
Input$2$0.27
Output$10$1.1
Cache Read$0$0.07
Cache Write$0$0.27

Grok-2 対 DeepSeek V3

モデル概要

Grok-2 and DeepSeek V3 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

主要仕様

ベンダーリリース日コンテキストウィンドウライセンス
Xai / Deepseek2024-08-13 / 2024-12-26131K / 64KProprietary / DeepSeek License

ベンチマークパフォーマンス

ベンチマークGrok-2DeepSeek V3勝者
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.084.9B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)93.289.3A
HumanEval88.482.6A
MATH76.861.6A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)87.588.5B

料金比較

入力出力キャッシュ読み取りキャッシュ書き込み
— / —— / —— / —— / —

100万トークンあたり — A / B

強み & 弱み

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

DeepSeek V3

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 82.6, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.3, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

編集者コメント

Grok-2 and DeepSeek V3 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

参考文献

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.