Key Specifications

SpecificationGPT-4oGemini 2.0 Flash
Vendoropenaigoogle
Version4o2.0-flash
Release Date2024-05-132024-12-11
Context Window128000 tokens1.048576e+06 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audiotext, image, audio, video
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGPT-4oGemini 2.0 FlashWinner
ARC95.7Gemini 2.0 Flash
BBH83.183.4Gemini 2.0 Flash
GPQA55Gemini 2.0 Flash
GSM8K95.892.7GPT-4o
HUMANEVAL90.290.7Gemini 2.0 Flash
IFEVAL85.9Gemini 2.0 Flash
MATH76.671.3GPT-4o
MMLU88.786.3GPT-4o
MUSR69.3Gemini 2.0 Flash
WINOGRANDE89.5Gemini 2.0 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)GPT-4oGemini 2.0 Flash
Input$2.5$0.1
Output$10$0.4
Cache Read$1.25$0
Cache Write$2.5$0

GPT-4o 対 Gemini 2.0 Flash

モデル概要

GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

主要仕様

ベンダーリリース日コンテキストウィンドウライセンス
Openai / Google2024-05-13 / 2024-12-11128K / 1048KProprietary / Proprietary

ベンチマークパフォーマンス

ベンチマークGPT-4oGemini 2.0 Flash勝者
ARC95.7B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)83.183.4Tie
GPQA55.0B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)95.892.7A
HumanEval90.290.7B
IFEval85.9B
MATH76.671.3A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.786.3A
MUSR69.3B
WinoGrande89.5B

料金比較

入力出力キャッシュ読み取りキャッシュ書き込み
— / —— / —— / —— / —

100万トークンあたり — A / B

強み & 弱み

GPT-4o

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Gemini 2.0 Flash

  • ✅ MMLU score 86.3, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.7, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 92.7, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

編集者コメント

GPT-4o and Gemini 2.0 Flash each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

FAQ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

参考文献

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.