GLM-4 Plus vs Qwen2.5 72B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of GLM-4 Plus and Qwen2.5 72B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | GLM-4 Plus | Qwen2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | other | alibaba |
| Version | glm-4-plus | 2.5-72b |
| Release Date | 2024-08-12 | 2024-09-19 |
| Context Window | 131072 tokens | 131072 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text, image | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Proprietary | Qwen License |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | GLM-4 Plus | Qwen2.5 72B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 94.5 | — | GLM-4 Plus |
| BBH | 83.6 | 82.4 | GLM-4 Plus |
| GPQA | 35.4 | — | GLM-4 Plus |
| GSM8K | 81.8 | 88.4 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| HUMANEVAL | 72.7 | 86.6 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| IFEVAL | 79.2 | — | GLM-4 Plus |
| MATH | 53.3 | 83.1 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MMLU | 84.3 | 86.1 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MUSR | 51.3 | — | GLM-4 Plus |
| WINOGRANDE | 85.8 | — | GLM-4 Plus |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | GLM-4 Plus | Qwen2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.5 | $0.5 |
| Output | $0.5 | $0.8 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
GLM-4 Plus 対 Qwen2.5 72B
モデル概要
GLM-4 Plus and Qwen2.5 72B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
主要仕様
| ベンダー | リリース日 | コンテキストウィンドウ | ライセンス |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other / Alibaba | 2024-08-12 / 2024-09-19 | 131K / 131K | Proprietary / Qwen License |
ベンチマークパフォーマンス
| ベンチマーク | GLM-4 Plus | Qwen2.5 72B | 勝者 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 94.5 | — | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 83.6 | 82.4 | A |
| GPQA | 35.4 | — | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 81.8 | 88.4 | B |
| HumanEval | 72.7 | 86.6 | B |
| IFEval | 79.2 | — | A |
| MATH | 53.3 | 83.1 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 84.3 | 86.1 | B |
| MUSR | 51.3 | — | A |
| WinoGrande | 85.8 | — | A |
料金比較
| 入力 | 出力 | キャッシュ読み取り | キャッシュ書き込み |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
100万トークンあたり — A / B
強み & 弱み
GLM-4 Plus
- ✅ MMLU score 84.3, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Qwen2.5 72B
- ✅ MMLU score 86.1, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 86.6, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 88.4, robust math reasoning.
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
編集者コメント
GLM-4 Plus and Qwen2.5 72B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
参考文献
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.