Claude 2.1 vs Claude 2: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Claude 2.1 and Claude 2 covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Claude 2.1 | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | anthropic | anthropic |
| Version | 2.1 | 2 |
| Release Date | 2023-11-21 | 2023-07-11 |
| Context Window | 200000 tokens | 100000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Claude 2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 84.8 | 80.4 | Claude 2.1 |
| BBH | 63.8 | 60.2 | Claude 2.1 |
| GPQA | 26.4 | 31.4 | Claude 2 |
| GSM8K | 45.7 | 32.5 | Claude 2.1 |
| HUMANEVAL | 28.1 | 31.7 | Claude 2 |
| IFEVAL | 55 | 55 | Tie |
| MATH | 15.5 | 21.9 | Claude 2 |
| MMLU | 60.9 | 66.3 | Claude 2 |
| MUSR | 37.7 | 35.2 | Claude 2.1 |
| WINOGRANDE | 67.4 | 66.4 | Claude 2.1 |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Claude 2.1 | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $11 | $11 |
| Output | $32 | $32 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Claude 2.1 対 Claude 2
モデル概要
Claude 2.1 and Claude 2 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
主要仕様
| ベンダー | リリース日 | コンテキストウィンドウ | ライセンス |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic / Anthropic | 2023-11-21 / 2023-07-11 | 200K / 100K | Proprietary / Proprietary |
ベンチマークパフォーマンス
| ベンチマーク | Claude 2.1 | Claude 2 | 勝者 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 84.8 | 80.4 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 63.8 | 60.2 | A |
| GPQA | 26.4 | 31.4 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 45.7 | 32.5 | A |
| HumanEval | 28.1 | 31.7 | B |
| IFEval | 55.0 | 55.0 | Tie |
| MATH | 15.5 | 21.9 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 60.9 | 66.3 | B |
| MUSR | 37.7 | 35.2 | A |
| WinoGrande | 67.4 | 66.4 | A |
料金比較
| 入力 | 出力 | キャッシュ読み取り | キャッシュ書き込み |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
100万トークンあたり — A / B
強み & 弱み
Claude 2.1
- ✅ 上下文窗口 200K，支持长文本。
- ⚠️ HumanEval 28.1，代码能力较弱。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Claude 2
- ✅ 上下文窗口 100K，支持长文本。
- ⚠️ HumanEval 31.7，代码能力较弱。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
編集者コメント
Claude 2.1 and Claude 2 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
FAQ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
参考文献
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.